LONDON — (March 26, 2012) — Resistance at individual and societal levels must
be recognized before real action can be taken to effectively address threats facing the
planet from human-caused contributions to climate change.
That's the message to this week's Planet Under Pressure Conference by a group of speakers
led by Kari Marie Norgaard, professor of sociology and environmental
studies at the University of Oregon. In a news briefing today, Norgaard discussed her
paper and issues her group will address in a session Wednesday, March 28, at 2 p.m.
London time (9 a.m. U.S. Eastern; 6 a.m. U.S. Pacific).
Scientists from multiple disciplines from around the world are at the conference to assess
where they stand before the June 4-6 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development
in Rio de Janeiro — also known as "Rio+20" since it is occurring 20 years
after 1992's Rio Earth Summit that drew officials from 172 governments.
"We find a profound misfit between dire scientific predictions of ongoing and future
climate changes and scientific assessments of needed emissions reductions on the one hand,
and weak political, social or policy response on the other," Norgaard said. Serious
discussions about solutions, she added, are mired in cultural inertia "that exists
across spheres of the individual, social interaction, culture and institutions."
"Climate change poses a massive threat to our present social, economic and political
order. From a sociological perspective, resistance to change is to be expected," she
said. "People are individually and collectively habituated to the ways we act and
think. This habituation must be recognized and simultaneously addressed at the individual,
cultural and societal level — how we think the world works and how we think it should
work."
In their paper, Norgaard and co-authors Robert Brulle of Drexel University in Philadelphia
and Randolph Haluza-DeLay of The King's University College in Canada draw from the work of
French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) to describe social mechanisms that maintain
social stability or cultural inertia in the face of climate change at the three levels.
At the personal level, climate-change information raises fear about the future, a sense of
helplessness and guilt. These emotions clash with individual — and often national
— identity, sense of self-efficacy and the need for basic security and survival. In
small groups, interactions often subvert political conversations and/or submerge the
visibility of climate-change issues. At the macro level, or society at large, the
co-authors point to an absence of serious discussion of climate change within U.S.
Congressional hearings and in media coverage.
In many discussions in the last 30 years, climate change has been seen as either a hoax or
fixable with minimal political or economic intervention, said Norgaard, author of the book
"Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life" (2011, MIT
Press). "This kind of cultural resistance to very significant social threat is
something that we would expect in any society facing a massive threat," she said. The
discussion, she said, is comparable to what happened with challenges to racism or slavery
in the U.S. South.
"Just as we cannot overhaul a car fleet overnight, we cannot change our ideological
superstructure overnight," Norgaard said. "We must first be aware that this
resistance is happening at all levels of our society," she said. "If you have to
push a heavy weight, it doesn't mean it can't be moved, but in order to push it you had
better know that you have something heavy and figure out how to move it — where to
put the lever to shift the weight."
Most discussion on climate change has focused on natural science. It is time, she said, to
broaden that approach. "Social scientific responses have been limited in their
primary focus on individuals. These explanations are important but partial and thus
inadequate as explanations or guides for future action. Our cross-dimensional model links
individuals, culture and society. We have to take all dimensions into account
simultaneously."
"Confronting climate change is daunting but it is not an insurmountable obstacle if
we collectively put our minds together," said Kimberly Andrews Espy, vice president
for research and innovation at the University of Oregon. "Interdisciplinary
collaboration among social scientists and those involved in technological advances can
help to move us forward."
About the University of Oregon
The University of Oregon is among the 108 institutions chosen from 4,633 U.S. universities
for top-tier designation of "Very High Research Activity" in the 2010 Carnegie
Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. The UO also is one of two Pacific
Northwest members of the Association of American Universities.
Media Contacts: Jim Barlow, director of science and research
communications, 541-346-3481, jebarlow@uoregon.edu.
- Pacific