John Holdren population control
Holdren co-authored with Paul and Annie Ehrlich more than three decades ago called Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment .
"The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary
fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because
some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birth rates
are rapidly reversed by other means. ...
"Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today [Ed. note: LIE! There are sterilants. They put them in vaccines!], nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. ... [Ed. note: Holdren and the NWO Gang do NOT care about members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. When the NWO Gang believe thay can get away with sterilizing females in mass they will do it no matter how bad the side-effects are.]
"Again, there is no sign of such an agent on the horizon. And the risk of serious, unforeseen side effects would, in our opinion, militate against the use of any such agent, even though this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children." [Ed. note: Holdren and the NWO Gang know there are sterilants and have not implemented it because the American people have not been zombized enough to accept it. Instead they are using socioeconomic pressures and murder of unborn babies (abortion) to reduce population growth.]
Later, the authors conclude, "Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great). [Ed. note: The NWO Gang has been using sterilants and abortion for decades to reduce population. No one knows how many children have been kept from being born worldwide but it well over 100 million in the last century.]
"Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea [to the unwashed masses], but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control [mandatory sterilization]. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries." [Ed. note: What Holdren and his gang of elitists said is that they want the unwashed masses to voluntarily murder their unborn children and be sterilized. Those who do not do this voluntarily will be forced to do so at the point of a gun! Got it?]
To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however." [Ed. note: What Holdren and his gang of elitists said is that they can make the Constitution say whatever they want it to say. In the future they plan to state, with the backing of the military, that the unwashed masses must murder their unborn children and be sterilized at their command.]
Conclusion: Holdren and the entire NWO Gang want every member of the unwashed masses to be sterilized except for the most genetically pure ones who they will use for breeding and perverse sexual delights. They will make sterilization mandatory as well as abortion. It is only a matter of time.
"To Achieve One World
Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism,
their loyalty to family traditions and national identification." (Brock Chisholm - Director of the World Health Organization)
"A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's going to get." (Ian Williams Goddard)
The fact is that "political correctness" is all about creating uniformity. Individualism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of the New World Order. They want a public that is predictable and conditioned to do as it's told without asking questions.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson