- Pacific
The CDC is engaged in a very clever, statistically devious spin campaign, and nearly
every journalist in the mainstream media has fallen for its ploy. No one has yet reported
what I'm about to reveal here.
It all started with the CDC's recent release of new statistics about swine flu fatalities,
infection rates and vaccination rates. According to the CDC:
• 61 million Americans were vaccinated against swine flu (about 20% of the U.S.
population). The CDC calls this a "success" even though it means 4 out of 5
people rejected the vaccines.
• 55 million people "became ill" from swine flu infections.
• 246,000 Americans were hospitalized due to swine flu infections.
• 11,160 Americans died from the swine flu.
Base on these statistics, the CDC is now desperately urging people to get vaccinated
because they claim the pandemic might come back and vaccines are the best defense.
But here's the part you're NOT being told.
The CDC statistics lie by omission. They do not reveal the single most important piece of
information about H1N1 vaccines: How many of the people who died from the swine flu had
already been vaccinated?
The CDC is intentionally not tracking how many of the dead were previously
vaccinated. They want you (and mainstream media journalists) to mistakenly believe
that ZERO deaths occurred in those who were vaccinated. But this is blatantly false. Being
vaccinated against H1N1 swine flu offers absolutely no reduction in mortality from
swine flu infections.
And that means roughly 20% of the 11,160 Americans who died from the swine flu were
probably already vaccinated against swine flu. That comes to around 2,200 deaths in people
who were vaccinated!
How do I know that swine flu vaccines don't reduce infection mortality? Because I've
looked through all the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that
have ever been conducted on H1N1 vaccines. It didn't take me very long, because the number
of such clinical trials is ZERO.
That's right: There is not a single shred of evidence in existence today that
scientifically supports the myth that H1N1 vaccines reduce mortality from H1N1 infections.
The best evidence I can find on vaccines that target seasonal flu indicates a
maximum mortality reduction effect of somewhere around 1% of those who are vaccinated. The
other 99% have the same mortality rate as people who were not vaccinated.
So let's give the recent H1N1 vaccines the benefit of the doubt and let's imagine that
they work just as well as other flu vaccines. That means they would reduce the mortality
rate by 1%. So out of the 2,200 deaths that took place in 2009 in people who were already
vaccinated, the vaccine potentially may have saved 22 people.
So let's see: 61 million people are injected with a potentially dangerous vaccine, and
the actual number "saved" from the pandemic is conceivably just 22. Meanwhile,
the number of people harmed by the vaccine is almost certainly much, much higher
than 22. These vaccines contain nervous system disruptors and inflammatory chemicals that
can cause serious health problems. Some of those problems won't be evident for years to
come... future Alzheimer's victims, for example, will almost certainly those who received
regular vaccines, I predict.
Injecting 61 million people with a chemical that threatens the nervous system in order to
avoid 22 deaths -- and that's the best case! -- is an idiotic public health stance. America
would have been better off doing nothing rather than hyping up a pandemic in order to
sell more vaccines to people who don't need them.
Better yet, what the USA could have done that would have been more effective is handing
out bottles of Vitamin D to 61 million people. At no more cost than the vaccines, the
bottles of vitamin D supplements would have saved thousands of lives and offered
tremendously importantly additional benefits such as preventing cancer and depression,
too.
Through its release of misleading statistics, the CDC wants everyone to believe that all
of the people who died from H1N1 never received the H1N1 vaccine. That's the implied
mythology behind the release of their statistics. And yet they never come right out and
say it, do they? They never say, "None of these deaths occurred in patients who had
been vaccinated against H1N1."
They can't say that because it's simply not true. It would be a lie. And if that lie were
exposed, people might begin to ask questions like, "Well gee, if some of the people
who were killed by the swine flu were already vaccinated against swine flu, then doesn't
that mean the vaccine doesn't protect us from dying?"
That's the number one question that the CDC absolutely, positively does not want people to
start asking.
So they just gloss over the point and imply that vaccines offer absolute protection
against H1N1 infections. But even the CDC's own scientists know that's complete bunk.
Outright quackery. No vaccine is 100% effective. In fact, when it comes to influenza, no
vaccine is even 10% effective at reducing mortality. There's not even a vaccine that's 5%
effective. And there's never been a single shred of credible scientific information that
says a flu vaccine is even 1% effective.
So how effective are these vaccines, really? There are a couple thousand vaccinated dead
people whose own deaths help answer that question: They're not nearly as effective as
you've been led to believe.
They may not be effective at all.
Think about this: 80% of Americans refused to get vaccinated against swine flu.
That's roughly 240 million people.
Most of those 240 million people were probably exposed to the H1N1 virus at some point
over the last six months because the virus was so widespread.
How many of those 240 million people were actually killed by H1N1? Given the CDC's claimed
total of deaths at 11,160, if you take 80% of that (because that's the percentage who
refused to be vaccinated), you arrive at 8,928. So roughly 8,900 people died out of 240
million. That's a death rate among the un-vaccinated population of .0000372
With a death rate of .0000372, the swine flu killed roughly 1 out of every 26,700 people
who were NOT vaccinated. So even if you skipped the vaccine, you had a 26,699 out of
26,700 chance of surviving.
Those are pretty good odds. Ridiculously good. You have a 700% greater chance of being
struck by lightning in your lifetime, by the way.
What it all means is that NOT getting vaccinated against the swine flu is actually a very
reasonable, intelligent strategy for protecting your health. Mathematically, it is the
smarter play.
Because, remember: Some of the dead victims of H1N1 got vaccinated. In fact, I
personally challenge the CDC to release statistics detailing what percentage of the dead
people had previously received such vaccines.
The headline to this article, "Thousands of Americans died from H1N1 even after
receiving vaccine shots" is a direct challenge to the CDC, actually. If the CDC
believes this headline is wrong -- and that the number of vaccinated Americans who died
from H1N1 is zero -- then why don't they say so on the record?
The answer? Because they'd be laughed right out of the room. Everybody who has been
following this with any degree of intelligence knows that the H1N1 vaccine was a medical
joke from the start. There is no doubt that many of those who died from H1N1 were
previously vaccinated. The CDC just doesn't want you to know how many (and they hope
you'll assume it's zero).
I find it especially fascinating that the simple question of "How many of the dead
were previously vaccinated?" has never been asked in print by a single
journalist in any mainstream newspaper or media outline across the country. Not the NY
Times, not WashingtonPost.com, not the WSJ, LA Times or USA Today. (At least, not that I'm
aware of. If you find one that does, let me know and I'll link to their article!)
Isn't there a single journalist in the entire industry that has the journalistic courage
to ask this simple question of the CDC? Why do these mainstream journalists just reprint
the CDC's statistics without asking a single intelligent question about them?
Why is all the intelligent, skeptical reporting about H1N1 found only in the alternative
press or independent media sites?
You already know the answer, but I'll say it anyway: Because most mainstream media
journalists are just part of the propaganda machine, blindly reprinting distorted
statistics from "authorities" without ever stopping to question those
authorities.
The MSM today, in other words, is often quite pathetic. Far from the independent media
mindset that used to break big stories like Watergate, today's mainstream media is little
more than a mouthpiece for the corporatocracy that runs our nation. The MSM serves the
financial interests of the corporations, just as the CDC and WHO do. That's why they're
all spouting the same propaganda with their distorted stories about H1N1 swine flu.
But those who are intelligent enough to ask skeptical questions about H1N1 already realize
what an enormous con the pandemic was. In the end, it turned out to be a near-harmless
virus that was hyped up by the CDC, WHO and drug companies in order to sell hundreds of
millions of doses of vaccines that are now about to be dumped down the drain as useless. (naturalnews, Mike
Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor)
http://www.naturalnews.com/027956_H1N1_vaccine_CDC.html
Sources for this story include:
CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/...
Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...
Eastern