The Nexus Of Evil - Pt 9A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity
By Philip Jones
- For most of us, the events of September 11th 2001 may have changed the
world as we knew it, but not the world that was! The Hidden Masters of that secret world
which most know nothing about, took a quantum leap towards the attainment of their `Great
Work Of Ages` that fateful Autumnal day, eight years ago. Ironically, and tragically, it
took the loss of thousands of lives, the destruction of millions of dollars worth of
property, and the sheer transparency of the official lie, to provide a shock sodden wake
up call to humanity that not all was as it should be.
- It is true that most of the global population sucked up the official
story programmed into them by the Mass Media; but nonetheless, for many like myself, when
those planes hit the twin towers, it was as if a `Stargate` to a different reality had
appeared before me, shattering what illusions I had left, providing the impetus for me to
once again use the investigative skills I had learnt as a Police Officer, in order to
search for that most elusive element in the human experience; The Truth!
- Following five years of reading and investigation, it was in 2007 that I
began to write down my thoughts. I am neither academic nor intellectual, just a retired
Cop, so the course I am now following is not an easy one. Yet the rewards of sharing one's
findings with those who have understanding, and leading them on to researchers far more
capable than myself, far outweigh the struggles and trials one faces in gathering such
information and then setting it down coherently for others to read.
- Here in this, the ninth part of what has become an extended series of
articles, we will bring our story more or less up to date, and in the following
conclusion, look forward to what likely scenario awaits us as we move ever closer to that
seemingly inevitable `crisis` point, which will determine whether the intrinsic good that
is in the heart of the mass of humanity, will arise at last, and release itself, from its
tormentors, or whether a Third World War of catastrophic proportions will cull the mass of
the people of the planet, and thrust humankind into the past darkly; inaugurating a brutal
Global Fiefdom, with Lucifer as its Royal Lord, and the Illuminists its Aristocratic
- If we accept that a conflict, or `Clash Of Civilisations` between the
West and Islam can be regarded as the key to unlock the Illuminati's Pandora's Box for the
installation of a world government, then in this the penultimate `episode` in the series,
it is to the Islamic world, its relations with the West, and the key conspirators
involved, that we must again return to and focus our attention on.
- So then, to the task at hand!
- The New Machiavelli:
- "World War Three is to be fomented by using the differences the
agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists and the Leaders of the Moslem
world. The war is to be directed in such a manner that Islam and Political Zionism
(including the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same time the
remaining nations, once more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to
fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and
economically." Albert Pike.
- Have you heard of Michael Ledeen? As a non American, I admit that I
had not, prior to reading David Livingstone's book, Terrorism And The Illumniati . I
would hazard a guess that even those aware of who Ledeen is, have no idea of the man's
extraordinary influence in US foreign affairs. I think it's time we get to know about a
man whose whole portfolio is tainted with murder and blood, and whose influence is such,
that innocent nations get invaded upon his recommendation.
- In order to ensure success in Pike's proposed clash with the Muslim
world, the Illuminati had intended all along, that following the 9/11 `False Flag`
operation, the already planned invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq would accomplish far more
than mere "regime change," and the ruse introduction of so called democracy;
rather, territorial and cultural conquest and occupation. Ledeen, one of the most most
influential of the Neo Con spokesmen, has termed the US strategy in the Middle East and
Central Asia as,"Total War."
- "No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of
enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do
Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we
just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to
piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great
songs about us years from now."
- Ledeen is a resident scholar at the right-wing "think-tank",
the American Enterprise Institute, where he works with the former chairman of the
Defence Policy Board, Richard Perle. He is also a contributing editor to the U.S.
National Review and the Jewish World Review, and was a founding member of the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs, JINSA. In 2003, the Washington Post discovered
that he was the only full-time international affairs analyst consulted by Karl Rove,
George W. Bush's closest advisor. In other words, the man is mainline Illuminati.
- Ledeen had been present in Italy in the late 1970s, when he acted in a
consultative capacity for Italian military intelligence, and cultivated strong connections
to right-wing factions, including the notorious P2 Masonic Lodge. P2 was responsible for
Italy's `Strategy of Tension,` which was a campaign of false-flag terror operations, waged
by the Gladio Brigades, under the patronage of the CIA and the Mafia. These were
intended to discredit the increasingly popular Communist Party.
- Early in 1978, Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped and later
assassinated by the so-called "Red brigades," an apparently pro Soviet terrorist
group. Evidence now exists that shows Moro's murder was orchestrated by P2, and that
both the "Red" and "Black" brigades were heavily penetrated by US
intelligence, who are credited with "running" them. The `Strategy of Tension`
campaign culminated in the Bologna train station bombing of 1980.
- When P2 had come under increasing scrutiny in 1979, Masonic grandmaster
Lucio Gelli had reportedly made his base of operations the Montecarlo Comite. Known
members of the Montecarlo Comite are Gelli, Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, former
Supreme Commander of NATO, and Michael Ledeen.
- Ledeen then returned to Washington in 1981 as "anti-terrorism"
advisor to Alexander Haig, the new secretary of state. During the following years, Ledeen
used his position as consultant to Haig, the Pentagon and the National Security Council
under Ronald Reagan, to propagate the idea of a global terrorist conspiracy based in the
Kremlin, with the KGB supposedly pulling the strings of all of the world's key terrorist
groups, particularly those in the Middle East.
- He was also a major player in the Iran-Contra Affair. As a consultant of
National Security Adviser Robert C. McFarlane, Ledeen vouched for Iranian intermediary
Manucher Ghorbanifar, and met with Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, and officials of
the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the CIA to arrange meetings with high-ranking Iranian
officials and the much-criticized weapons-for-hostages deal with Iran, that would become
known as the Iran-Contra scandal .
- Ledeen had, along with Arnaud de Borchgrave, in `The New Republic,`
"exposed" some details of Billy Carter's dealings with the Muammar Gaddafi
regime in Libya, which de-legitimized his brother's presidency. Ledeen seems to be again
involved in the fabrication of evidence, this time in the instance of the forged documents
"uncovered" by Italian intelligence. These depicted an attempt by Iraq's Saddam
Hussein regime to purchase yellow-cake uranium from Niger, which formed the basis of
President Bush's support for the invasion of Iraq, and which subsequently unravelled into
the "Plamegate" scandal.
- Regarding regime change in Iraq, in 2002 Ledeen criticized the views of
former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft, writing:
- "He fears that if we attack Iraq we could have an explosion in the
Middle East. It could turn the whole region into a cauldron and destroy the War on Terror.
One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever
there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today.
If we wage the war effectively, we will bring down the terror regimes in Iraq, Iran, and
Syria, and either bring down the Saudi monarchy or force it to abandon its global assembly
line to indoctrinate young terrorists. That's our mission in the war against terror."
- Ledeen specifically called for the deposition of Saddam Hussein's regime
by force in 2002:
- "Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire need to invade
Iraq, then when do we do so? Yesterday!"
- Ledeen's statements prior to the start of the Iraq war such as
"desperately-needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein" and "dire
need to invade Iraq" make his later statement to Glenn Greenwald that he
"opposed the military invasion of Iraq before it took place" to be an
"outright lie". However, Ledeen maintains these statements are consistent since:
"I advocated - as I still do - support for political revolution in Iran as the
logical and necessary first step in the war against the terror masters."
- In Ledeen's own words, on a leadership trait he admires, from his book
- "In order to achieve the most noble accomplishments, the leader may
have to 'enter into evil.' This is the chilling insight that has made Machiavelli so
feared, admired and challenging... we are rotten.... It's true that we can achieve
greatness if, and only if, we are properly led."
- Ledeen stated, at a meeting of the American Enterprise Institute,
involving Richard Perle, Newt Gingrich, Nathan Sharansky and James Woolsey:
- Regime change" must be achieved by any means necessary in Iraq,
Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority."
- In his book, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli's Iron
Rules Are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago, Michael Ledeen proclaimed,
"Change above all violent change is the essence of human history." Again
we see how intrinsic the application of the Hegelian Dialectic  is to the Illuminati
Agenda. Ultimately, Ledeen believes that violence in the service of the spread of what he
feels is "freedom" around the world is merely a continuation of America's
revolutionary struggle. "Total war" says Ledeen, "not only destroys the
enemy's military forces, but also brings the enemy society to an extremely personal point
of decision, so that they are willing to accept a reversal of the cultural trends. The
sparing of civilian lives cannot be the total war's first priority... The purpose of total
war is to permanently force your will onto another people."
- An Arc Of Crisis - For Muslims.
- Following the defeat of the Soviet Union in 1989, at the hands of the
CIA backed Mujahideen in Afghanistan , and very much in line with what the PNAC would
later propose in it's 2000 document, `Rebuilding America's Defences,` the US
administration began to assume an ever more aggressive stance in its international
policies. As we have seen above in Part Eight, (and dealt with below) in the wake of 9/11,
the G.W Bush administration launched what could be interpreted as a NEO CON -Zionist
Crusade against the nations of Afghanistan and then Iraq.
- In Afghanistan, even though some eight years later, hostilities
continue, a so-called victory was quickly declared over the Taliban's Islamic Emirate,
eliminating the rule of Shari'ah and replacing it with a puppet anti-Islamic government
that showered the Afghani people with promises of a better life and freedom. In the
absence of any rival superpower, the US, now assuming for itself the role of global
policeman, all indications are that the PNAC conspirators in the US Government calculated
that the so-called victory in Afghanistan would pave the way for unconditional and
unopposed control over the Muslim world.
- However, a few months following the invasion, it became evident the US
had not even been able to secure the safety of its own soldiers in Afghanistan-let alone
to take control of the country-proving the Taliban, having executed a tactical
withdrawal of their troops from major cities to preserve their arms and fighters, remained
undefeated. The only discernible achievement of the US led invasion has been the spread of
poverty, crime, diseases, a degradation of security and an `explosion` in drug trafficking
in those areas under the control of the Satanic alliance.
- In addition, the sharp increase in day and night Mujahideen operations
against the allied forces, forcing them to withdraw from many of their positions in the
south, east and centre of the country, had inflicted continuous losses to the allied
military forces. But despite all this, the US has on the contrary, vigorously pursued the
murderous Neo Con Agenda of colonialism and conquest in Afghanistan, and at this juncture,
there seems no end to its ambitions there.
- Then, in 2003, ignoring world opinion and massive public opposition,
American led, so called coalition forces, invaded Iraq on grounds which were nothing but
lies, launching what was termed operation `Shock And Awe,` against a people who had
already suffered terribly for almost a decade under US sponsored UN sanctions, and who
were in no position to defend themselves..
- As in Afghanistan, the US administration exercised similar inhumane and
barbaric policies in their attempt to take control over Iraq, as is reflected in the
random detention, on a massive scale of Iraqi men, women, the elderly and even children;
along with the destruction and looting of their homes and properties under the pretext of
'hunting down' resistance fighters.
- As a result, thousands of ordinary Iraqis with no part to play in the
saga, other than trying to live their lives and survive, have been illegally detained and
many killed whilst in detention. It is clear that the objective of such a hostile policy
against innocent civilians has been to terrorize the Iraqi populace into subjection.
- In order appreciate the strategy of the operations now being conducted
against the Islamic world by the Illuninati Hidden Power, in the ostensible form of the
Neo Con/Libs and Zionists, we will briefly examine in more detail the conflicts in both
Afghanistan and Iraq.
- Afghanistan : Slaughter For Oil Pipelines And Poppy Fields.
- On September 11, 2001, as the twin towers of the World Trade Centre
collapsed to the ground, and part of the Pentagon lay in rubble, all fingers almost
immediately began pointing to the one man, whom the US, has, over the years brainwashed
the American public to hate, fear and seek "protection" against. The U.S. has
accused Osama bin Laden of being involved in many acts of terrorism, not providing any
evidence to justify these accusations.
- In Afghanistan, the Taliban Government followed suit and denounced the
attacks. Wakeel Ahmed Mutawakel, the foreign minister of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban
regime, told the Arab television network Al Jazeera, "We denounce this terrorist
attack, whoever is behind it." [CNN - 09/12/01]. Afghanistan was one of the very
first nations to express its condolences to the families of the victims of the horrific
and atrocious act, which has no basis in Islam.
- The U.S. Administration however, playing the wounded and indignant
victim, stated adamantly, via the bought and paid for global media, that it was in no
doubt that Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network was the force behind the attacks, and
almost immediately threatened Afghanistan with military measures for harbouring a
"terrorist" and "terrorist camps."
- The US quickly managed, mostly but not exclusively via coercion, to get
some forty other nations `on board, in their 'coalition against `terror.` The Taliban
asked the U.S. not to attack their already war-ravaged country, which even at that time
continued to feel the effects of sanctions and an ever present famine. They also
repeatedly asked the U.S. to provide them with evidence for their accusations that Osama
bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, making
it clear that they would try him in court, but no evidence was given by the U.S., either
to the world, or to the Taliban. The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef
said in a press conference on Friday September 21 that, "It has angered Muslims of
the world and can plunge the whole region into a crisis. We are ready to cooperate if we
are shown evidence. If American agencies are bent on putting the blame on bin Laden, then
they won't be able to catch the real culprits."
- In an attempt to win popular support and pacify world public opinion,
the US claimed to have provided its allies with irrefutable evidence that Osama bin Laden
was responsible for the attacks. However, when British Prime Minister, Tony Blair,
subsequently made this 'evidence' public, numerous political analysts and journalists
rejected it as being flimsy and weak.
- Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar said, "It is unacceptable that
America issues ultimatums to the Islamic world either to listen to America's message or
accept destruction." Holding Osama bin Laden responsible for the strikes in New York
and Washington is an excuse, he said. "Afghanistan does not have resources, nor is
Osama that powerful, nor does he have contacts with the outside world to carry out or plan
such attacks. We also do not give him permission to use Afghan territory against any other
country." Osama bin Laden has also explicitly denied having any involvement in the
attacks on the U.S.
- Whilst the Taliban made repeated efforts to prevent another devastating
war, by asking America to provide evidence of it's accusations against Osama bin Laden,
Mullah Omar also made it clear that if the U.S. still chose to fight unnecessarily, the
Taliban would retaliate. "Let America be assured that war in Afghanistan is not a
picnic," he said, explaining that Afghanistan had never tried to create problems with
America. "We have held talks in the present and the past with U.S. governments
several times, and we are ready for more talks. If they choose otherwise, they are looking
for an endless war that will burn America and America only. When America doesn't choose a
peaceful way out of this and chooses war and confrontation, she only is responsible for
- Undeterred by the calls for justice, the U.S. together with its biggest
ally, the UK, began its preparations for war, placing military forces on standby alert.
- Was The "Evidence" Against Osama Bin Laden Justification For
- If the case against Osama Bin Laden was weak, and it really was, then we
have to ask ourselves "why did the US and the coalition attack Afghanistan in the
first place and why are they still there?"
- The UK's Independent newspaper on 7th October 2001, published an article
of a UK Government document report intended to vindicate its case against Bin Laden, as
being entirely without substance.
- The report was initially heralded as being evidence of Osama bin Laden's
guilt, but instead, close analysis of the 21-page document put out by the Government
revealed a report of conjecture, supposition and unsubstantiated assertions of fact. It
used every trick in the Whitehall drafter's arsenal to make the reader believe they were
reading something they were not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin Laden for the events of
- Tony Blair and his officials were it was said delighted with the
reaction to publication of the dossier. British Ministers believe the document has sealed
the propaganda war, convincing the country of the need to move against Mr. bin Laden and
al-Qa'ida and to accept limited British and civilian casualties.
- The report was put together by a committee which included senior members
of MI5 and MI6, working round the clock, with drafts going backwards and forwards to
Washington. Within Whitehall, the dossier was seen as vital to gaining the approval of a
naturally cautious and sceptical British public. As a paper produced by mandarins anxious
to brook no argument it is a classic of its kind, straight from the script of Yes
Minister: short on checkable detail; long on bold assertion; highly selective with the
choice of facts.
- UK Officials when they prepare such reports operate to a set of
principles. They know that unlike the US, and thanks to their efforts in suppressing
freedom of information down the years, Britain is a secret society. The British are not
accustomed to having anything presented to us about intelligence matters and threats to
national security. That, plus the British characteristic of not defying authority,
especially in times of crisis, means that if the Government says loudly enough that
something is "evidence", even if it is not, it will be accepted as such.
- In the introduction, not the conclusion, the document stated: "The
clear conclusions reached by the government are: Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the
terrorist network which he heads, planned and carried out the atrocities on 11 September
2001." Introductions, as the authors knew too well, normally set up a document,
relating the background as to why the book or, in this instance, a government document,
has been written. Here, that convention was rejected: from the word go, the Government
wanted to ensure the point of the document was conveyed.
- The document's complete lack of substantive evidence proving that Osama
bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on 9/11, in addition to all other official
grounds given by the US Government renders the war in Afghanistan illegal. Many people go
on about the US obtaining UN mandates for this action but the only type they obtained were
mandates which legitimise this action in principal, what that means is that the UN
mandates only say (in lay terms) that a nation is justified in retaliation against another
nations unprovoked attack, what is not mentioned is that absolutely no mandate was
obtained to bomb Afghanistan on the basis of weak evidence.
- Leaving that aside, lets' discuss the above points in the two previous
sections, did the US have something to hide in not presenting the "evidence" to
the Taliban and a World Court? Well of course it did! If Osama was guilty then why did
they not simply present the `evidence` to the Taliban instead of belligerently demanding
that the Taliban hand him over, with no conditions even though the US provided absolutely
zero evidence that bin Laden was guilty? Certainly it would seem that the Taliban were
justified in not handing over Osama Bin Laden, just because a foreign country demands his
extradition, without presenting substantive `evidence!` This swiftly moves us to conclude
that the evidence was insufficient to convict Osama Bin Laden! The conclusion of the
article itself is summarised quite neatly in this one sentence:
- "...close analysis of the 21-page document put out by the
Government on Thursday reveals a report of conjecture, supposition and unsubstantiated
assertions of fact. It uses every trick in the Whitehall drafter's arsenal to make the
reader believe they are reading something they are not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin
Laden for the events of 11 September."
- Again we must ask ourselves, if the "evidence" was not
sufficient to convict bin Laden in a court of law (as the above article says) then why was
the war launched in the first place and why are they still bombing Afghanistan? We would
do well to remember that the USA stated that they it was bombing Afghanistan specifically
to make the Taliban hand over Bin Laden.
- Another shoddy tactic used by the Western leaders to further demonise
Osama Bin Laden in order to rally public support, was the disappearing "video"
in which Osama Bin Laden apparently "confesses" that he was in fact the
mastermind behind 9/11. Needless to say, the video which was scheduled to be screened to
the world failed to appear, and all we were left with as `proof` was the dubious word of
Prime Minister Tony Blair and an unsubstantiated transcript of the video. But consider
this; if they managed to make a transcript of Osama's `confession` , why then were they
unable to produce the video for the world to see? Think about it, if they claim to have
seen this video why did they not show it to us? Since they had a transcript it is only
logical that they had the tape, so where was this tape? At this point I would like to
offer two good links which feature many good articles and links about this ongoing saga,
What really happened? and September the 11th, they provide good articles and links from
highly credible sources.
- To shed further doubt on the official reason for the invasion of
Afghanistan, here is a short transcript from a BBC article which says that Bin Laden never
claimed to have any nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction in the Urdu translation
of the interview he had with the editor of the Pakistani newspaper, Dawn, and that it was
only in the English translation that he claimed to have these weapons. The full article
can be found here.
- Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir, the editor of the Urdu-language
newspaper Ausaf, conducted the interview with Bin Laden, who is widely held responsible
for the suicide attacks on the United States two months ago. Dawn's English version quotes
Bin Laden as saying:
- "If America used chemical and nuclear weapons against us, then we
may retort with chemical and nuclear weapons. We have the weapons as a deterrent."
- Mr Mir then asks Bin Laden where he got the weapons, which the al-Qaeda
leader declines to answer.
- But in the Urdu version of the article, Bin Laden does not threaten to
use nuclear or chemical weapons.
- "The US is using chemical weapons against us and it has also
decided to use nuclear weapons. But our war will continue," he says, according to the
BBC's own translation of the Ausaf article.
- The two versions are otherwise very similar, says the BBC Monitoring
- Truly an insight into the workings of the media whores the world over!
This clearly shows that an intended and purposeful propaganda campaign to demonise Osama
bin Laden in particular and Islam in general in the eyes of the West, in an effort to gain
support for the illegal war against the people of Afghanistan.
- "I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing
of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids
causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden
even in the course of a battle."- Osama Bin Laden. This is what he declared in an
interview with the Pakistani newspaper, `The Ummat.`
- Since the "evidence" against Osama Bin Laden is non-existent
in legal terms, why then is the US led coalition still occupying Afghanistan and condoning
what can only be described as `Neo Colonialism` and massive scale terrorism?
- Perhaps the same rational, logic and action should have been applied to
Israel when they they refused to hand over Ariel Sharon, who was being investigated for
major war-crimes (this is exactly the same situation as with Bin Laden, who has never been
convicted, and yet the US demanded his extradition) yet we saw no great military coalition
being formed against Israel, let alone a bombing campaign! Again, it must be emphasised
that the Taliban were never provided with any evidence to prove Osama's guilt, so could
hardly be expected to hand over a man to another country on the basis of mere suspicion?
- The Neo-Con Zionist Axis Turned America Into A Terrorist Nation.
- This is in flagrant violation of UN rules, but as we all know by now,
the USA government, or rather those pulling its strings do not consider themselves to be
subject to the multitude of laws and regulations used to bind the rest of us, while at the
same time, hypocritically condemning other nations for not following UN rules.
- This link to a speech by Noam Chomsky explains how the US, even
though in not so may words, declared a terrorist state by an International court of human
rights, has refused to accept any responsibility for it's covert operations (terrorism) in
Nicaragua or to submit to due process for it's policy which led to the deaths of thousands
of people in that land.
- Of interest is the The America service members protection Act 2001
which effectively prevents it's VIP's, politicians and it's military from being held to
account and or prosecuted for war crimes. One must ask, if a nation goes to these lengths
to `immunise` itself from the possibility of being prosecuted for war-crimes which are
known about; is it committing wartime atrocities which are hidden from public knowledge?
- I think it safe to say that the latter option is in the affirmative. In
fact, the Project Monarch and MK-Ultra Mind Control Programmes attest to this fact. But I
- Terrorism Is Subjective..
- So, former President Bush's `just war?` turns out to be anything but.
Clearly many other states harbour supposed terrorists, so why are they specifically
bombing Afghanistan (and now Yemen, Iraq, Somalia, etc.)? America did not even accede to
the Taliban's simple request, that it hand over evidence of Osama's guilt to have him
extradited. Of course, they never had a case against him in the first place, and were
merely attempting to justify the implementation of `Phase One` in the build-up to the
Clash Of Civilisations.
- As an added bonus, most certainly the American defence industry has
reaped huge benefits from the war, and as Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his book, `The
Grand Chessboard,` the domination of Central Asia and its plentiful supply of mineral
deposits, would be the primary strategic objective in the 21st Century.
- The Devastation Of An Innocent People.
- What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties -- 3,767
civilian deaths in eight and a half weeks -- in the U.S. air war upon Afghanistan? The
explanation is the apparent willingness of U.S. military strategists to fire missiles into
and drop bombs upon, heavily populated areas of Afghanistan. A legacy of the ten years of
civil war during the 80s is that many military garrisons and facilities are located in
urban areas where the Soviet-backed government had placed them since they could be better
protected there from attacks by the rural Mujahideen. Successor Afghan governments
inherited these emplacements.
- To suggest that the Taliban used 'human shields' is more revealing of
the historical amnesia and racism of those making such claims, than of Taliban deeds.
Anti-aircraft emplacements will naturally be placed close to ministries, garrisons,
communications facilities, etc.. A heavy bombing onslaught must necessarily result in
substantial numbers of civilian casualties simply by virtue of proximity to 'military
targets', a reality exacerbated by the admitted occasional poor targeting, human error,
equipment malfunction, and the irresponsible use of out-dated Soviet maps. But, the
critical element remains the very low value put upon Afghan civilian lives by U.S.
military planners and the political elite, as clearly revealed by U.S. willingness to bomb
heavily populated regions.
- "Current Afghan civilian lives must and will be sacrificed in order
to [possibly] protect future American lives."
- Actions speak, and words [can] obscure: the hollow pretence of pious
pronouncements made by Rumsfeld, Rice and the compliant corporate media about the great
care taken to minimize collateral damage is plain for all to see. Other U.S. bombing
targets struck are impossible to 'explain' in terms other than the U.S. seeking to inflict
maximum pain upon Afghan society and its perceived 'enemies': the targeted bombing of the
Kajakai dam power station, the Kabul telephone exchange, the Al Jazeera Kabul office,
trucks and buses filled with fleeing refugees, and the numerous attacks upon civilian
trucks carrying fuel oil. Indeed, the bombing of Afghan civilian infrastructure parallels
that of the Afghan civilian.
- These Are people We Are Killing.
- Mohammed Raza, an `odd-job man`, was not so lucky. At 8 pm. as he was
walking home, near to the Jalalabad airport. A cruise missile targeted at a Taliban
facility `a few hundred yards away,` strayed and landed next to him. Shrapnel pierced his
neck, grazing his spine, paralysing him.
- Three days later, a researcher at the Institute for Health & Social
Justice, Partners in Health of Harvard University, H.J. Chien, confirmed that civilians
had been killed in Jalalabad and elsewhere. On October 9th, the Pakistan Observer
[Islamabad] daily newspaper reported on the first night, "37 Killed, 81 Injured in
Sunday's Strikes." The casualties spanned four provinces : Kabul - 20, heart -9,
Kandahar -4 and Jalalabad -4.
- By October 10th, The Guardian reported 76 dead civilians. And by October
15th, the leading Indian daily, The Times of India was mentioning over 300 civilian
casualties and that the US-UK bombing action was in violation of Article 51 of the United
Nations Charter allowing the use of force in self-defence. On the following day [October
16th], the alternative U.S. media noted that during the first week of bombing, 400 Afghan
civilians had been slaughtered.
- Yet, the mainstream western press only took note of civilian those
casualties on October 9th when a cruise missile destroyed the building of the United
Nations land mine removing contracting firm, the Afghan Technical Centre, in the upper
class Macroyan residential district of eastern Kabul, killing four night watchmen.
Tellingly, the day before, October 8th, twenty other Afghans living near the Kabul airport
(in the Qasabah Khana neighborhood) and near the Kabul radio station were also killed. On
October 10th, the Sultanpur Mosque in Jalalabad was hit by a bomb during prayers, killing
17 people. As neighbours rushed into the rubble to pull out one injured, a second bomb was
dropped reportedly killing at least another 120 people (though I have not included this
figure in my tally).
- Fleeing the intense bombing in Kandahar, Mehmood, a Kandahar merchant,
brought his family to his ancestral village of Chowkar-Karez, a village 25 miles north of
Kandahar. His extended family, crowded into six cars, arrived at a village just about when
it was attacked by U.S. war-planes during the night of October 22/23rd. Ironically, the
cars arriving in the night may have prompted the raid -- as the Pentagon labels such
movements after dark as `a target of opportunity.` Said Mehmood, "I brought my family
here for safety, and now there are 19 dead, including my wife, my brother, sister,
sister-in-law, nieces, nephews, my uncle. What am I supposed to do now?"
- One is tempted to naively ask, "Why is the media covering up these
events and giving a false image of low civilian casualties? " But those who
understand the Illuminati Agenda, and the personages involved know full well why. The
Western media is owned by the same people waging war against the innocents. It plays a
major role in the shaping (programming) of public opinion in the West (and around the
globe), and if it were shown that there is a high casualty rate in Afghanistan there would
be protests hampering the American/NATO military effort in Afghanistan. It should
therefore seem logical to even the most uninformed citizen that the media is aiding the
American government in its destructive and murderous campaign in Afghanistan. This is not
only dishonest but it facilitates the deaths of innocents by way of hiding from the people
the knowledge that this killing is happening.
http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/09/afghani-killing-fields.html for further
evidence of Nato War Crimes.
- Iraq: Return To Babylon.
- It can reasonably said that the Illuminati conspiracy began long long
ago in a town called Babylon whose ancient ruins lie just 50 miles south of today's
Baghdad. In his book Terrorism And The Illuminati, David Livingstone explains thus:
- "The plot for a series of World Wars in the twentieth century,
culminating in a third against the Muslim world, was devised in the eighteenth century, by
American Civil War general, Albert Pike, then Grand Master of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, a
primary adjunct of the Illuminati. However, though the final stages of this plot have been
largely reserved for our time, the conspiracy is affiliated with a lore of occult
knowledge that dates back to at least the sixth century BC. This lore begins with a
heresy, known as Kabbalah, which disguises itself as Jewish, but is a pact to seek world
domination, and the eradication of religion in favour of the worship of Lucifer."
- In the sixth century BC, the Assyrians finally succeeded in the sacking
Jerusalem, and taking the remaining Jewish population into captivity, this time to the
city of Babylon, near what is now Baghdad in Iraq. The tragedy was of enormous
psychological consequence for Jewish people. The presence of the Jewish people in the Holy
Land was regarded by many as a core tenet of their faith. According to the Bible, God had
ratified a covenant between Himself and Abraham, to grant the land of Palestine to his
descendants. This promise, however, was contingent on the Jewish people adhering to the
Commandments of the Law. Ultimately, their Exile was a punishment fulfilled for their
repeated transgressions and occult leanings.
- Nevertheless, there were some among the Jewish exiles, who chose not to
regard their captivity as a punishment, but as a temporary trial. Instead, they
interpreted their status as God's "Chosen" as a permanent relationship, and that
the Promise to inhabit the land of Zion, or Palestine, was binding forever. Thus, this new
Zionist interpretation was closely intertwined with the mystical directions of the
Kabbalah. Therefore, this new Zionist interpretation was a bastardization of the real
intent of the Jewish faith, and, as we shall see, was not an integral part of it, but was,
through the centuries, increasingly imposed upon the rest of the Jewish community, by a
minority committed to this diabolical scheme.
- In Babylon, these heretical Jews, who refused to purge their religion of
pagan influences, instead added to them the adopted practices of Babylonian magic.
However, knowing that magic was forbidden in Judaism, they rejected the God of Israel,
choosing instead to honour Lucifer, who they identified with the traditional enemy of the
Hebrew faith, Baal. In order not to reveal their apostasy, they disguised their hidden
faith as an "interpretation" of the religion, a cult now known as the Kabbalah.
- Again, David Livingstone explains:
- This development is carefully described in the Koran, which explains
that, though it was claimed the Kabbalah was derived originally from King Solomon, it was
demons who taught such things, teaching them that which had been revealed to the angels
Harut and Marut in Babylon. According to the Koran, chapter 2: 101-102:
- "When a messenger was sent to them (the Jews) by God confirming the
revelations they had already received some of them turned their backs (to God's message)
as if they had no knowledge of it. They followed what the demons attributed to the reign
of Solomon. But Solomon did not blaspheme, it was the demons who blasphemed, teaching men
magic and such things as were revealed at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But
neither of these taught anyone (such things) without saying; "we are a trial, so do
not blaspheme." They learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife.
But they could not harm anyone except by God' s permission. And they learned what harmed
them, not what benefited them. And they knew that the purchasers of (magic) would have no
share in the happiness of the hereafter. And vile was the price for which they sold their
souls, if they but knew."
- Borrowing from Jewish themes, therefore, these Kabbalists would seek
world domination by arguing that they were preparing the world for the coming of the
Messiah, and merely aiding God in bringing about His promise to institute them as rulers
of the world. Having rejected the Jewish faith, however, they did not await the real
Messiah, but would seek to establish their own ruler, who they would falsely claim as
messiah, who would aid them in implementing the global acceptance of their occult creed.
- According to their Kabbalistic interpretation of the Bible, their
`Messiah` is to be of line of King David, and since that time, and in order to preserve
this purported lineage, until the advent of their expected leader, these Luciferians have
been carefully intermarrying amongst each other, and have included among them many of the
leading figures of history. They begin with a Persian Royal family, who intermarried with
that of Alexander the Great. By combining with that of Herod the Great, these families
were responsible for the creation and dissemination of the leading mystery school of the
Roman Empire, the Mysteries of Mithras, which eventually succeeded in co-opting the
emerging Christian movement, by producing Catholic Christianity.
- Nevertheless, a secret, or Gnostic, version of Christianity, also
derived from Mithraism, survived to compete with Catholicism, in the form of several
secret societies, like the Templars, Rosicrucians and Freemasons, practising occult arts,
or what is known as `witchcraft.` This tradition, was perpetuated by the most popularized
branch of the Luciferian bloodline, the Merovingians. Symbolized by the Holy Grail, the
Merovingians, after intermarrying into the family of a Jewish Exilarch, or claimant to the
Jewish throne, culminated in all the leading families of the Crusades.
- It was at this time that this European branch of the family recombined
with others from Eastern Europe and Armenia. These Eastern aristocracies derived from the
enigmatic Khazars, who had populated southern Russia and the Basin of the Don River, and
who, in the eighth century AD, had converted to Judaism. Legend has it, however, that the
Khazars were remnants of the Lost Tribes. Armenia, just across the Caucasus, was another
locale of these supposed Lost Tribes. It was the intermarriage and perpetuation of these
aristocratic bloodlines that were being referred to in the heraldic symbols of the lily,
the rose, the double-headed eagle, and the skull and crossbones.
- Also during the Crusades, this network connected with an important
occult center hiding within the Islamic world, in Cairo Egypt, who followed the heretical
version of Islam known as Ismailism. According to Masonic legend, a number of these
"Eastern Brethren" were rescued and brought to Scotland, where they provided the
basis of Sottish Rite Freemasonry, which only emerged in the eighteenth century. However,
at the same time, this legend also provided the basis for the establishment of Freemasonry
in Egypt, which then became the second centre of Illuminati activism. It was from these
secret networks of impostors by which the Western powers created Islamic terrorism, used
to foment of a Clash of Civilizations, through the fabrication of the terrorist threat.
- Operation Iraqi Freedom.
- The 2003 invasion of Iraq was officially, and now in hindsight,
grotesquely dubbed, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and has been followed by an interminable U.S.
Occupation of that sad country. As a propaganda tool of its political perpetrators, this
spurious action, having first been promoted as a "War to liberate Iraq" has now
become in effect a "War in Iraq."
- "The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state
terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The
invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross
manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate
American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort
- all other justifications having failed to justify themselves - as liberation. A
formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of
thousands and thousands of innocent people. We have brought torture, cluster bombs,
depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the
Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East"-- Nobel
Laureate Harold Pinter.
- The US led seven-year war of aggression and subsequent occupation of
Iraq has at its core a Luciferian purpose, is driven by political `Neo Con/Lib Zionism,`
and is economically supported by a variety of very powerful imperial interests. However
these interests do not in themselves explain the depth and scope of the sustained, massive
and continuing destruction of an entire society and its reduction to a permanent state of
- We will now examine the main orchestrator's, manipulators and strategic
reasoning behind the invasion of Iraq and as is ever pertinent in such events, ask that
perennial question, "Cui Bono," or who benefits. It must be understood by the
reader that although major players in the `Geo Political` drama of current world events,
these are not the `Capstone Elite` of the Illuminati. Nonetheless, they wield significant
and malevolent influence within the halls of power.
- The Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC), which features such prominent
hard-line supporters of the State of Israel as Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz, Irving
(Scooter) Libby, Stuart Levey, Elliot Abrams, together with a cohort of consultants such
as Presidential speech writer David Frum, and secondary officials and policy advisers to
the State Department. These committed Zionist `insiders' were further supported by
numerous `Israel-First` functionaries in the fifty one primary American Jewish
associations, which form the PMAJO (President of the Major American Jewish Organizations).
It is their publicly affirmed goal to advance Israel's agenda, and using its substantial
influence, strongly advocated the case for an American led war against Iraq in order to
overthrow Saddam Hussein, occupy the country, physically divide Iraq, destroy its military
and industrial capability and impose a pro-Israel/pro-US puppet regime. Their proposed
plan intended that Iraq be ethnically cleansed and then divided along religious and tribal
lines, as was advocated by the ultra-right, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and
the `Liberal' President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and
militarist-Zionist, Leslie Gelb.
- Influential and powerful criminals like Donald Rumsfeld and Vice
President Dick Cheney whose aim was to extend US imperial reach in the Persian Gulf and
strengthen its geo-political position by eliminating a strong, secular, nationalist backer
of Arab anti-imperialist insurgency in the Middle East in the shape of Saddam Husein.
These militarists sought to a) further project the US military s encirclement of Russia
and b) secure complete control over Iraqi oil reserves thereby exerting economic and
strategic pressure on China. A far reaching element in all of this was Vice President
Cheney's past ties with the oil industry and current (at that time) his role as CEO of
Halliburton's giant military base contractor subsidiary Kellogg-Brown and Root, which was
consolidating the US Empire through worldwide military base expansion. US oil companies,
in fear of losing ground to their European and Asian competitors, were anxious and eager
that Saddam Hussein be dealt with.
- The `Neo Imperialist` strategy of conquest and occupation was designed
to establish a long-term colonial military presence in the form of strategic military
bases with a significant and sustained contingent of colonial military advisor's and
combat units. The brutal colonial occupation of an independent secular state with a strong
nationalist history and an advanced infrastructure with a sophisticated military and
police apparatus, extensive public services and wide-spread literacy naturally led to the
growth of a wide array of militant and armed anti-occupation movements.
- In order to offset the threat of a major collective insurgency by
Iraqi's, US colonial officials, the CIA and the Defence Intelligence Agencies utilised the
well proven `divide and rule' strategy (the so-called `El Salvador solution' associated
with the former `hot-spot' Ambassador and US Director of National Intelligence, John
Negroponte) fomenting armed sectarian-based conflicts and promoting inter-religious strife
in order to debilitate any effort at a united nationalist anti-imperialist movement. The
subsequent deconstruction of the secular civilian bureaucracy and the Iraqi armed forces
which remained was designed by the Zionists in the Bush Administration to strengthen
Israel's power in the region and to promote the rise of those militant Islamic groups,
which had been previously suppressed by Saddam.
- Israel was a past master of this strategy, having sponsored and financed
sectarian Islamic militant groups, like Hamas, as an alternative to the secular Palestine
Liberation Organization, thereby setting the stage for sectarian fighting among the
- The results of these cynical policies were disastrous for the Iraqi
people as the occupation `gangsters` used US taxpayers money to fund and exacerbate a
plethora of internal conflicts as mullahs, tribal leaders, political gangsters, warlords,
expatriates and death squads proliferated. Iraq pool of armed, unemployed young men formed
the nucleus of a a new mercenary army. The engineered `civil war' and `ethnic conflict'
provided spurious justification for the occupying forces and their Iraqi puppets to render
redundant huge numbers of experienced soldiers, police and civil servants from the
previous regime (especially if they were from Sunni, mixed or secular families) and to
undermine entirely the very basis for civilian employment.
- Using the pretexts of a generalized `war against terror,' US Special
Forces and CIA-directed death squads proceeded to spread terror throughout Iraqi civil
society, targeting those they suspected of daring to criticise the puppet government. This
tactic has decimated the Iraqi educated and professional classes, who were purposely
identified as being subversives. Precisely the Iraqis most capable of re-constructing an
independent secular republic.
- A primary engine behind the second Iraq war was an influential group of
neo-conservative and neo-liberal ideologues with strong ties to Israel. They regarded
(what for them), was success in the Iraq campaign as the first `domino' to fall, in a
series of wars to `re-colonize' and redraw the map of the Middle East . They disguised
their imperialist ideology with a paper thin veneer of rhetoric about spreading democracy
in the Middle East (notwithstanding of course, the undemocratic policies of their beloved
Israel over its subjugated Palestinian populace). In merging together Israeli regional
ambitions and US imperial interests, the neo-conservatives and their neo-liberal fellow
travellers in the Democratic Party have supported the two Illuminati chosen Puppet
Presidents, Bush and Obama in their escalation of the wars against Afghanistan and
Pakistan. They to a man supported Israel's recklessly savage bombing campaign against
Lebanon, the land and air assault and massacre of thousands of civilians trapped in Gaza,
the bombing of Syrian facilities and are vocally behind Israeli lobby pushing for a
pre-emptive, full-scale military attack against Iran.
- The advocates of the PNAC's strategy for multiple simultaneous wars in
the Middle East and Central Asia regarded the securing of total control over Iraq as a
necessary prerequisite prior to unleashing the full force of the awesome destructive power
available to them. As a means of consolidating this control, and by way of silencing Iraqi
civilian dissidents, they have funded both Shia clerics and Sunni tribal assassins, and
contracted countless private mercenaries among the Kurdish Peshmerga warlords to carry out
selective assassinations of leaders of civil society movements.
- The colonial administration has created and trained a 200,000 member
Iraqi colonial puppet army composed almost entirely of Shia gunmen, and excluded
experienced Iraqi military men from secular, Sunni or Christian backgrounds. A barely
reported aside of this build up of American trained and financed death squads and its
puppet `Iraqi' army, was the virtual destruction of the ancient Iraqi Christian
population, which was displaced, its churches bombed and its leaders, bishops and
intellectuals, academics and scientists assassinated or driven into exile. Being well
aware that Iraqi Christians had played a key role the historic development of the secular,
nationalist, anti-British/anti-monarchist movements, their elimination as a force of
influence was no coincidence. With their puppets in power, Iraq would serve as a launching
platform for its strategic pursuit of the other `dominoes' (Syria, Iran, Central Asian
- Since the US led coalition invaded in March 2003, over 1.3 million Iraqi
civilians have died as a result of hostilities. To date, the invasion and occupation has
cost the US treasury over $666 billion. This massive expenditure is evidence in itself of
its centrality in the larger strategy for the entire Middle East/South and Central Asia
- Back To The Stone Age?
- Prior to the onslaught in 2003, Iraq had the most advanced
scientific-cultural order in the Arab world, despite the repressive nature of Saddam
Hussein's police state. There was a system of national health care, universal public
education and generous welfare services. The separation of church and state and the
protection of religious minorities (Christians, Assyrians and others) which existed prior
to the invasion appears in sharp contrast to what has resulted from the US occupation and
its destruction of the Iraqi civil and governmental structures. The oft propagated
severely dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein somehow then managed to preside over a highly
developed modern civilization in which advanced scientific work went hand in hand with a
strong nationalist and anti-imperialist identity. In turn, this resulted especially in the
Iraqi people's solidarity for the plight of the Palestinian people under Israeli rule and
- The architects of the invasion understood that it would take more than
`regime change' to extirpate what was a deeply embedded and advanced secular republican
culture in Iraqi conciousness. The American war planners and their Israeli advisers knew
well prolonged occupation would increase Iraqi nationalism and provide a focal point for
resistance. The secular nation would have to be destroyed.. Retrogression became the
principal instrument for the US to impose its colonial puppets, with their primitive,
`pre-national' loyalties, in power in a culturally purged Baghdad stripped of its most
sophisticated and nationalistic social strata.
- The Al-Ahram Studies Center in Cairo, maintains that more than 310 Iraqi
scientists were eliminated during the first 18 months of the US occupation a figure that
the Iraqi education ministry does not dispute. Another report listed the killings of more
than 340 intellectuals and scientists between 2005 and 2007. Bombings of institutes of
higher education had pushed enrollment down to 30% of the pre-invasion figures. In one
bombing in January 2007, at Baghdad's Mustansiriya University 70 students were killed with
- Assassination As Political Terrorism:
- Baghdad was once known as the `Paris' of the Arab world, in terms of
culture and art, science and education. In the 1970's and 80's, its universities were the
envy of the Arab world. The US `shock and awe' campaign that rained down on Baghdad in
2003 evoked emotions akin to an aerial bombardment of the Louvre, the Sorbonne and the
greatest libraries of Europe.
- The use of assassination is an extreme form of terrorism, which has
causes a ripple effect throughout the community. Statistics reveal that for every Iraqi
intellectual assassinated, thousands of educated Iraqis left the country or abandoned
their work for safer, less vulnerable activity. Up to and including November 2008,
eighty-three academics and researchers teaching at Baghdad University had been murdered
and several thousand of their colleagues, students and family members fled for their
- Bloody purges of academics have also occurred in all of Iraq's,
including those in the provinces : 127 senior academics and scientists were assassinated
at the various well-regarded universities in Mosul, Kirkuk, Basra and elsewhere. The
provincial universities with the highest number of murdered senior faculty members were in
cities where the US and British military and their Kurdish mercenary allies were most
active: Basra (35), Mosul (35), Diyala (15) and Al-Anbar (11)
- It was the Iraqi military and its allied death squads which carried out
most of the killing of academics in the cities under US or `allied' control. The
methodical assassination of academics was a nation-wide campaign to destroy the cultural
and educational foundations of a modern Arab civilization. The death squads carrying out
most of these assassinations were unleashed by American military strategists with the
intended aim of wiping out any politically conscious intellectuals and nationalist
scientists who might pursue an agenda for re-building a modern, secular society and
independent, unified republic.
- The US war and occupation of Iraq, has been declared a success by both
Presidents G.W Bush and Barrack Obama. By what standards of decency and justice can an
operation which has resulted in the forcible occupation of an independent nation of 23
million citizens, the installation of a puppet regime ensconced, where colonial mercenary
troops in the pay of American officers terrorise the population, and the nation's oil
fields have been appropriated and put up for sale be declared a success?
- I'll tell you! None whatsoever. It's the devil's work for sure and I
mean it literally.
- Iraq's laws which protected its patrimony, its cultural treasures and
national resources, have been wiped from the books. The occupiers have imposed a
`constitution' favouring US Imperialist interests. Israel and its Zionist flunkies in the
American administration can celebrate the demise of a modern adversary and the conversion
of Iraq into a cultural-political desert. To add further insult to injury, the looted
treasures of ancient Mesopotamia have `found' their way into the collections of the elite
in London, New York and elsewhere.
- The Iranian people should take Michael Ledeen at his word, and should be
viewing events in neighbouring Iraq with not a little trepidation, while the `collectors`
wait and anticipate the pillage and plunder awaiting them in Iran.
- Postscript: For a peek into `our boys'` mentality during the Gulf War,
the U.S. Air Force's 77th Tactical Fighter Squadron published a songbook before the
bombing began, describing their plans for Iraq. The only part that can be reproduced in
polite company was this little ditty:
- "Phantom fliers in the sky, Persian-pukes prepare to die, Rolling
in with snake and nape, Allah creates but we cremate."
- The rest of songbook is, in the words of David Stannard, a "melange
of sadism and obscenity, most of them employing personifications of entire Arabic and
Islamic peoples as racially inferior, maggot-infested women whose mass destruction by the
Americans is equated with brutal, violent s-x... Wade Frazier.
- Comments to - http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com
- or firstname.lastname@example.org
- 1] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm
- 2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen
- 3] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/node/35
- 4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle
- 5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute
- 6] http://911review.com/precedent/century/gladio.html
- 7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due
- 8] http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html
- 9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan
- 10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban
- 11] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1648572.stm
- 12] http://www.islamicity.com/islamiTV/?ref=3167
- 13] http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news326.htm
The US War against Iraq: The Destruction of a Civilization by James Petras