Ive repeatedly documented that the Neocons planned regime change in Iraq, Libya, Iran, Syria and a host of other countries right after 9/11 if not before.
And that Obama is implementing these same plans just with a kindler, gentler face.
Glenn Greenwald provides further documentation that the various Middle Eastern and North African wars were planned before 9/11:
General Wesley Clark said the aim of this plot [to "destroy the governments in ...Iraq, ... Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran] was this: They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control. He then recounted a conversation he had had ten years earlier with Paul Wolfowitz back in 1991 in which the then-number-3-Pentagon-official, after criticizing Bush 41 for not toppling Saddam, told Clark: But one thing we did learn [from the Persian Gulf War] is that we can use our military in the region in the Middle East and the Soviets wont stop us. And weve got about 5 or 10 years to clean up those old Soviet regimes Syria, Iran [sic], Iraq before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us. Clark said he was shocked by Wolfowitzs desires because, as Clark put it: the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments? Its not to deter conflicts?
[I]n the aftermath of military-caused regime change in Iraq and Libya with concerted regime change efforts now underway aimed at Syria and Iran, with active and escalating proxy fighting in Somalia, with a modest military deployment to South Sudan, and the active use of drones in six count em: six different Muslim countries, it is worth asking whether the neocon dream as laid out by Clark is dead or is being actively pursued and fulfilled, albeit with means more subtle and multilateral than full-on military invasions (its worth remembering that neocons specialized in dressing up their wars in humanitarian packaging: Saddams rape rooms! Gassed his own people!). As Jonathan Schwarz put it about the supposedly contentious national security factions:
As far as I can tell, theres barely any difference in goals within the foreign policy establishment. They just disagree on the best methods to achieve the goals. My guess is that everyone agrees we have to continue defending the mideast from outside interference (I love that Hillary line), and the [Democrats] just think that best path is four overt wars and three covert actions, while the neocons want to jump straight to seven wars.
The neocon end as Clark reported them regime change in those seven countries seems as vibrant as ever. Its just striking to listen to Clark describe those 7 countries in which the neocons plotted to have regime change back in 2001, and then compare that to what the U.S. Government did and continues to do since then with regard to those precise countries.
Note: The so-called war on terror has also weakened our national security and created many more terrorists than it has killed, imprisoned or otherwise stopped. It is also destroying our economy. (WashingtonsBlog, 11.28.2011) http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/neoconservatives-planned-regime-change-throughout-the-middle-east-and-northern-africa-20-years-ago.html
"To Achieve One World
Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism,
their loyalty to family traditions and national identification." (Brock Chisholm - Director of the World Health Organization)
"A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's going to get." (Ian Williams Goddard)
The fact is that "political correctness" is all about creating uniformity. Individualism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of the New World Order. They want a public that is predictable and conditioned to do as it's told without asking questions.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson