A TIME FOR PLAIN SPEAKING
It has been
reported that our firemen may no longer use the pole in their fire stations for fear they
might injure themselves.
Regardless of claims to the contrary, all this nonsense falls under
the responsibility of the Queen as the official Governor of this nation according to her
coronation oath. We elected her to govern this nation and we pay her good money to do the
job. The Queen has the power to delegate the authority of governance, but she remains the
official Governor, so that which goes wrong falls on her shoulders.
Thousands of letters have been sent to the Queen imploring her to uphold her coronation
oath. In the few that have been acknowledged her lackeys have invariably claimed that the
Queen is obliged to take the advice of her ministers. Just what that is supposed to mean
is anyone's guess and doubtless deliberately deceptive, but it implies that she is
subordinate to her subordinate ministers, which is just another nonsense. They never
mention the advice given by her Privy Councillors. The question is, did the Queen bow to
the demands of her ministers in 1972 or was the whole debacle her idea in the first place.
The Queen certainly ignored the advice of her Privy Councillors the Lords Kilmuir and Wilberforce who wrote open letters pointing
out the constitutional implications of the European
Communities Act, and that our sovereignty would be lost to the European Community. The Queen therefore
could have been in no doubt what so ever of the direction the Act would take us. Every
organisation must have someone at its head to steer it and take the flack when things go
wrong. The Queen is supposed to be the leader of this nation, not the Prime Minister, who
according to law is subordinate to the Monarch by oath, having been appointment by the
Queen.
There can be no doubt that in 1972 the Queen either surrendered the sovereignty of her
office to the Franco German Axis or she allowed it to be taken from her by her ministers.
Since then the nation has gradually fallen apart at the seams. Parliament has unlawfully assumed the powers we vested in the
Monarch and uses those powers against us. We are bullied into conformity at every turn, we
are not even allowed to speak our minds. We are forced to exchange the emblem of our flag
for the emblem of the Franco German Axis and a foreign religion, whose leader by church
law is not allowed jurisdiction in this nation. Our traditional money has been taken away
from us, and we can be made common criminals in our own land for using our own traditional
measurements. We are taxed out of our minds to fund the imperial aspirations of the Franco
German Axis, at the expense of healthcare, education and pensions and most essentially our
nation's defence.
While the nation degenerates into chaos, Elizabeth the Betrayer swans around in splendour
acting out a charade to give the impression that nothing has changed, giving cover for a
despotic and traitorous parliament, while bit by bit and step by step it seeks for itself
the high office of a puppet junta for its tyrannical foreign masters, its simple task
being to suppress the people and raise revenue for the European political empire.
As our treasonous parliament has gained confidence in its treachery, supported and
protected by a politicised judiciary of weasel words, with its new found boldness it now
openly ignores constitutional constraint, the coronation oath and the rule of law, and
beams its triumph at its surrender of the supremacy of our Constitution to the Franco German Axis, backed it seems,
either directly or with tacit consent, by Elizabeth
II, supposed Sovereign Head of State,
Governor of the nation and our Church.
There can be no sovereign head of state in a nation which is no longer sovereign, and no
governor of a nation which is no longer self governing. The claim that we now share
sovereignty is an utter nonsense, sovereignty shared is sovereignty lost. It seems we the
British people have been disenfranchised, sold out, betrayed by those in whom we placed
the care and defence of the nation state and our honest trust.
All the available evidence suggests that either the Queen abdicated in 1972 or she was
deposed by her ministers and the powers we the people vested in her at the time of her
coronation have been assumed by our despotic Parliament. Clearly treason has been
perpetrated at the highest level. In 1999 following the Maastricht Treaty a clergyman, having taken an oath of allegiance to the Queen, made
enquiries as to whom he owed his oath of allegiance. Eventually he received this reply.
"The question has been asked recently by someone else. The
Registrar therefore consulted Buckingham
Palace concerning the Oath. The Palace consulted Brussels, who replied that
the Oath could stand as it was for the present."
Concerned British subjects, aware
that treason was taking place and under their constitutional obligation according to the
law of Misprision of Treason,
submitted their suspicions of treason to a number of police authorities. In each instance the Chief Constables of those authorities
claimed that such an issue was nothing to do with them, despite treason being the head of
all crime. So to whom do the police now owe allegiance?
Letters have been sent to the Palace, the Archbishop
of Canterbury, the Lord Chancellor,
the Attorney General, the Prime
Minister and the Department of
Constitutional Affairs asking, is the Queen still sovereign Monarch as she was on
the day of her coronation in 1953. All have declined to answer this simple question one
way or the other.
With consummate and deceitful skill the Great Betrayal of the British people has been kept
hidden from them, the word TREASON has become one which dare not speak its name. The
national media has been stifled, and those organisations that have long opposed our
Constitution have been used to disseminate disinformation, thus a state of general
ignorance and incredulity has been maintained in the public domain, while in the higher
offices of the establishment the whip of deference has been ruthlessly wielded. There is
presently a move afoot to encourage the people to demand a referendum entitling them to
vote away their own constitution, thus inciting the people in their ignorance of their own
constitutional protections to engage in an act of treason against themselves.
It must now, as never before, be recognised that the essential fabric of this nation is
not about our temporary Parliaments,
it is about the British people and the Monarch, bound to each other by contract according
to the Monarch's coronation oath, and this still stands regardless of whether the Queen
fell or was pushed in 1972. The Queen agreed to be the physical embodiment of the people's
sovereignty, and distancing herself from the people and staying regally aloof does not
change or annul that commitment.
The British Constitution, made up of
its Acts and treaties between the Monarch and the people, and representing the sum of all
that we the people are as a nation state is, as it was intended to be, the peoples defence
against despotic Parliaments and Monarchs.
It must be recognised that our constitutional Monarchs are compelled by and are under the
rule of our law.
The bedrock of the Constitution is the Magna
Carta, in which Article 61 clearly states that should the Monarch deviate from the
constraints of the rule of law, the people have the lawful right to use any means at their
disposal to force the Monarch to abide by the rule of law, even to the extent of engaging
in civil war, in which any forces of the state opposing the people would be acting
treasonously.
It must now be recognised that the time is upon us to face up to dreadful fact, that we
the British people either exercise our lawful right provided for us under Article 61 of
the Magna Carta, or we will be finished as a nation state of free and independent people
of self political determination for ever.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed. If
you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly. You may come to the
moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you, and only a precarious
chance of survival.
There may even be a worse case, you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory,
because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." Winston Churchill.
This item of Plymdem E-news comes from the
Plymouth, Devon, branch of the Democracy
Movement.
Please visit us at: www.plymdem.co.uk