smith Cult Resource Page
- by David
Burgin. Excellent overview.
Calvary Chapel -
- Good overview, provided by a student of cult apologist
, Jeffrey K. Hadden
. See notes regarding
his Sociology 257
History of the Jesus People
by David Di Sabatino, and basis for his book "The Jesus People
. (No longer online. Archived material available on request to
researchers. Email: Apologetics
). See also
People Movement - by David Di Sabatino. A major reference work. "This in-depth
analysis of the available literature on the Jesus People Movement includes a guide to the
books, articles, journal entries, music, films and videos accessible for further study. In
addition to providing the context in which to study the Movement and the guide to the
Jesus People Movement literature, this invaluable resource benefits from the author's
interaction and interviews with over four hundred of the Movement's participants. "
Includes details about the history of Calvary Chapel.
Calvary-Chapel found on mIRC Undernet. (IRC software can be downloaded at the mIRC
- homepage). Note:
channels are started by certain critics
of Calvary Chapel. The same warning applies as for the unofficial CC Usenet newsgroup
regarding this unofficial Usenet group. See also History of the arc-cc Newsgroup
Calvary Chapel's Alternative Newsgroups
alternatives to the unoffical Usenet group.
A Venture In Faith
2 hour video of the history of Calvary Chapel. Needs the free RealPlayer
- Calvary Chapel's Homepage. Links
to many other CC resources.
- Links to several
sites about the Jesus People Movement
Note, the site's apparent pluralistic
approach not surprisingly leads to a dim view of what it calls Calvary Chapel's ''attacks
on other religious groups.'' Nevertheless, Adherents.com is an excellent source of
statistical information about a wide variety of religious movement.
Calvary Chapel FUAQ
- Part of outspoken
Calvary Chapel critic Douglas
site. Keyed "grey" (grey zone) due to his rabid, un-Christlike
behavior in the arcc-c newsgroup
. Known for his attacks on those who
don't agree with him (and recently his forging
of a post in the name of one of his critics), he is not a recommended source of
Gilliland's FUAQ Answered